tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9712793.post8144957335326837243..comments2023-12-26T00:08:21.129+13:00Comments on Brain Stab: Books You Should Be Reading Number 27 OF A BunchJoshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12428777233351272669noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9712793.post-22669952071414343762007-09-14T09:13:00.000+12:002007-09-14T09:13:00.000+12:00Wow. Who would have thunk it? If that passage is a...Wow. Who would have thunk it? If that passage is anything to go by, then I will enjoy his stuff even more than Stephen Fry. <BR/><BR/>The Wodehouse comparison just made me tingle...Miss Smuggershamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14206572373676151684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9712793.post-82492792851115384952007-09-11T17:58:00.000+12:002007-09-11T17:58:00.000+12:00Hugh Laurie is hott.Hugh Laurie is hott.Mrs Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13864664806865081684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9712793.post-43233691514152729002007-09-07T10:39:00.000+12:002007-09-07T10:39:00.000+12:00I think the genius of that piece is 'Moving on to....I think the genius of that piece is 'Moving on to...' where he makes what initially feels like a descriptive aside (that has gotten too big for itself) into something that deserves to blossom and flourish and generally bring joy to all humanity.<BR/><BR/>Which it has.<BR/><BR/>Apparently he submitted the book under another name as he was afraid it might just get published because he wrote it rather than it being any good. It's wonderfully Wodehousian (very much as if it were being written by someone closely related to Bertie Wooster) whilst being on a topic Wodehouse would never have touched, something I believe Hugh Laurie was going for.That Morthos Starehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03631902183661240588noreply@blogger.com